CHAPTER I
DEFLECTIONS
To a
large extent, the manner in which you react
to fear determines the make up of your
personality.
(Myself)
Have you been told that the
genetic make up of your nervous system is not strong enough to cope with the
complex responsibilities of our modern world?
Have you been told to
simplify your life --- to give up some of your most cherished dreams? If
you have, or if you have come to such a decision on your own, then, by the time
that you finish reading this book, you will know that such advice was ---
wrong.
You will begin to stride
forward confidently in areas that cause you concern or leave you on the
verge of panic today.
You will become expansive rather than restrictive.You will exude enthusiasm
and energy rather than uncertainty and lethargy. You will learn to calm
down and take small steps that will ultimately and unequivocally lead to bigger
and better goals. --- Let’s get started.
He was 19 years old and a
pivotal moment in his life was about to occur. He had been born into
abject poverty in a small southern town near the Mississippi
River.
He had already experienced
a high level of rejection in his chosen profession in another famous location
and his fear of failure was robbing him of the confidence he needed.
He turned to the young
entertainer that he had befriended and in total seriousness said, --- When
it is my turn to go on stage, if I am too scared to do it; I want you to
get behind me and push me through the stage
curtain. This pivotal moment was occurring at the Louisiana Hayride.
It was a local southern or western music concert.
The name of the entertainer
who was asked to do the pushing if necessary was Jim Reeves; the nervous young
entertainer was --- ELVIS PRESLEY.
The previously mentioned
rejection happened when Elvis appeared for the first time on the Grand Old
Opry. It was something less than
sensational and as he left the stage, the announcer sarcastically told him not
to quit his day job, which was driving a truck.
If he had taken this
advice, if his fears and nervous tension had prevented him from appearing on
the Louisiana Hayride and going forward from there; he may have indeed lived
his life as an itinerant worker rather than the incredible entertainer
whose music and memory may live forever.
Of course one must have
talent and in the case of a singer, --- good looks also. One only has to
look at a program like American Idol on TV to realize that there are many
people with the confidence to get out there on stage and perform, but whose
level of talent is nowhere to be found.
If fear can deflect our
behavior and our life itself so powerfully, --- obviously it is of paramount
importance to understand fear as completely as possible.
While we do understand the
importance of fear, we have unfortunately, not realized how completely it can
dominate our personality.
Every human being is
affected by fear. If a lawyer does not overcome his fear of public
speaking, he does not become a trial lawyer but chooses instead some other
area of law to practice.
In many cases this fear is
never verbalized except to ones most intimate friends. This would be a
perfect example of a negative response to fear.
Fear is not some horrible
weakness that a cruel and callous Creator* has inflicted upon his unsuspecting
children which of course includes you and I.
The following is a footnote to the word Creator.
Creator *
I believe that the ideas that I have put forward to
describe how the human mind functions; remain valid no matter what form of
religion you follow. I view all of them
as vestiges of our superstitious beliefs.
I do not believe in Atheism either.
However, if you are concerned about how I reached the decision
that there is a Creator, I would respectfully refer you to my blog entitled,
--- The Religion Of Truth which can be accessed at: religionforthefuture.blogspot.com
How I reached the conclusion that there is a Creator
is best determined by reading the article entitled, --- Defending Intelligent
Design, which you will find on the first page of that document.
On the contrary, fear is
our most prized possession when we must face the unknown and try to transfer
that unknown into the plus side of our accumulating storehouse of knowledge.
For reasons known only to
our Creator, we were placed upon the face of this earth with less knowledge
than is required for us to succeed. It is only through the emotion of
fear that we can approach the unknown but
still maintain a high potential to remain alive.
In the presence of fear, it
is altogether right and proper that we should back off if possible from an
achievement that scares us. But it is
also right and proper that we should act correctly to this fear.
The following statement is
the most important one that you will read in this book. If we react
correctly to the emotion of fear, it will motivate us towards increased
knowledge and understanding.
What is life all
about? What are we, the human race as a whole, doing here? No
definitive answer can be given to that question and any attempt to answer it
must be partial in nature, but for our purposes, here in this book and in life
itself, --- we are here to achieve.
Life is nothing more or
less than an endless series of achievements, each one of which carries with it
the potential for either success or failure.
If the latter occurs, then
the potential to develop distorted or even irrational fears about this failure
can occur. And still further, the potential for fears to conglomerate and
confuse the issue even further is also possible.
Since fears deflect human
behavior then, when a multitude of influences as described above are combined
together, they have the potential to deflect ones behavior so drastically that
a psychiatrist or even other human beings begin to label such a person as being
mentally ill.
To overcome the feelings of
fear in any situation, you must increase your knowledge about the achievement
in question and then augment it with action.
If life forces you to act
first, then avoidance behavior, if possible, is the first option. If that
is not a reasonable option, then you must act in accordance with the level of
understanding that you can bring to bear on the situation.
Unfortunately, this can
lead to mistakes for some people. It is
absolutely paramount that we do not dictate to ourselves that we must be
perfect.
You must give yourself the
right to fail so that in the process of such action, you can learn from your
mistakes and be better prepared to be successful at whatever achievement that
you have chosen to embrace.
Of course if you become
involved in an achievement that demands perfection, then you must be able to
shoulder the resulting stress and still remain as calm and confident as
possible.
That type of behavior in
such a situation must find the person ready to learn as much as possible about
every aspect of the achievement that he or she is trying to succeed
at.
All of us carry fears
inside our minds. Some people carry many more fears than others.
There is so much work to be done in this world to try to maintain the level of
civilization that we have achieved thus far, that even with the limitations to
our effectiveness brought about by our fears, most of us are considered to be
contributing and relatively successful members of the human race.
However, if our fears
become conglomerated, if they become distorted, if you are not sharing them
with others in a manner that would allow you to set aside those of your fears
that prove to be unreasonable, your behavior could take you out of the
so-called normal zone and into the so-called “abnormal” zone.
If all three of the above
conditions are present, and in all probability, some others also, then you
could find yourself exhibiting irrational behavior and be told that you are
unable to handle the stress involved in everyday modern life. And
of course, if that deflection is severe enough, you could be told by a
psychiatrist that you are mentally ill.
Contained inside the above
paragraph is the illuminating and unmistakable truth that what we now refer to
as mental illness, in many cases, is not caused by some genetic or chemical
imbalance inside the human brain.
On the contrary, it is
caused by a conglomeration of improper reactions to fear and improper thinking,
caused by distorted fears that are at all times negotiable.
Yes indeed, a certain
percentage of mental illness is caused by actual physical damage either at birth or from genetic reasons. However, some of
that damage occurs as a result of the administration of
neuroleptic drugs that are currently prescribed to people who are told that
they cannot handle the stress in their lives or that they are mentally
ill.
Thank goodness that such
drugs have been developed because the methods used to help the mentally ill in
the past were monstrous compared to these new drugs. But these drugs
should only be used in short-term emergencies. They should never become
life-long addictions.
MISTAKES
The
person who does things makes many mistakes,
but they
never make the biggest mistake of all,
which is
--- to do nothing.
(Benjamin
Franklin)
In one of my original
writings for this book, the next five pages were to contain some of the most
beautiful thoughts that I had ever written, at least I thought they were.
However, I failed to use the
draft copy feature on the word processor [yes, it was that long ago] that I was
using at the time and to my great regret, I mistakenly erased all five
pages.
It is all well and good for
me to tell you not to demand perfection from yourself, but what about this
ridiculous mistake that I have just admitted to you?
Yes, I was so disgusted
with myself over this mistake, that I took the rest of the day off, but there I
was the next day back at the word processor again.
One of the many drawbacks
to our continued increase in knowledge on a personal level and on a global
level for the human race itself, is our fear of failure and of facing the
truth.
No matter how inconvenient
or how complicated the telling of the truth can make a situation, --- in the
long run, your chances for success in whatever achievement that you are
involved in are in direct proportion to your ability to face the truth. Unless of course, you are living a lie, or
you are a criminal who must avoid the truth to continue to be successful.
I was so worried all day
long whether or not I would be able to recall from memory the wonderful words and ideas that I
had lost in the morning. But for all I know, these ideas
that I am expressing right now are far more important than those that I had
lost the day before.
How am I to know whether or not you --- as the
reader, --- would tune out yesterday’s words, but retain forever what I am
saying right now?
Perhaps by admitting my
mistake, you have now made a determined decision not to be so hard on yourself
for the mistakes that you make also. That could be a much greater message
to give to my readers than any of the lost ideas that I was so impressed with.
In reality, none of those
ideas were original. I had thought about them and written about them
before. I cannot remember enunciating them as precisely as I did
yesterday, but nevertheless, it is entirely possible that later in this book I
will use those ideas and express them as fluently as, or even better than those
which I have lost through my own bad habits.
How do you view the ideas
expressed above? If you allow mistakes to rob you of your
self-confidence, you will actually increase your chances of making more
mistakes in the future.
If you look at mistakes as
a learning process and maintain a reasonable level of self-confidence, your
chances of success in the future will be increased.
Better for me to have lost
5 pages at the start of this book and learn from that mistake, then to lose 50
pages in the future with a similar error.
In the television movie
called, “The Untouchables” with Kevin Costner, at one point in the story he
rebukes a corrupt public official for trying to bribe him.
The culprit warns Kevin
that he will be sorry for his high handedness and that he is making a terrible mistake.
Kevin’s response is, --- “Yeah, well I’m making a lot of mistakes lately and
I’m beginning to enjoy them.”
When Winston Churchill was
finally handed the reins of power in England during the second World
War, a member of the previous government asked him:
“Aren’t you afraid that
you will make the same mistakes that we made.” Winston answered, ---
“Not at all.” “We will make a brand new set of mistakes.”
Does this sound like a
cavalier approach to a very serious problem? The unequivocal answer is
--- absolutely not. The individual who has a distorted fear of
failure actually increases his potential to fail.
His focus is so completely
on negative thoughts that he does not entertain the necessary positive thoughts
that are required to be successful. The correct approach to any
fear is to increase your knowledge of the achievement in question.
The shortest answer, as in
that which Winston gave, is often the most powerful. Contained inside
Winston’s apparently flippant remark is a veritable deluge of psychological
maturity. First of all he is saying that he has learned from the mistakes
that others have made and he will do his very best to avoid repeating them.
He is also saying that he
knows that he will make new mistakes but he does not intend to allow those
mistakes to rob him of the confidence and action that must be taken in the
future.
Furthermore, he is implying
that he does not have to be perfect. His archenemy Adolph Hitler must
also make awesome decisions, which will cause him to make mistakes also.
Winston’s job is not to be perfect, but to make fewer mistakes than his
adversary does.
None of Adolph Hitler’s
Generals could risk disagreeing with him on penalty of banishment from the high
ranks of the Nazi party, [read Hitler himself] or even death.
In effect, Hitler robbed
himself of the knowledge that the truth could have given him. Thank God
that his dictatorial arrogance helped to dictate his ultimate defeat.
STRESS
We
believe, incorrectly, that the word fear denotes weakness. As a result, we use the word stress, when in
reality, they are synonymous.
(Myself)
Another of Churchill’s
brilliant comments occurred while his party was in opposition. One of the
members of his party rose in Parliament to castigate the government for their
inability to act and their total indecisiveness. Winston stood up and
refuted his colleague. ---
“It is not true that the
members of government cannot make a decision”. “They have indeed reached
a decision”. “They have decided to remain undecided.”
Sometime in the future, and
I hope it is sooner rather than later, the expression mentally ill will be used
sparingly if not at all. In its place we will refer to such people as
suffering from conglomerated and distorted fears and who are in need of
behavioral assistance to return to more realistic, confident and mature
approaches to life.
As incredible as the above
achievement seems to be, it is only part of what this new understanding holds
forth for those who are considered to be normal.
The correct approach to
fear is going to allow the entire human race to embrace more achievements
without unnecessarily damaging their physical, emotional and mental well
being. The psychological necessities of life are as
follows:
1. Safety
2. Approval
3. A sense of belonging.
4. The desire to experience action which of course includes sexual
activity ultimately leading to procreation.
5. The desire to acquire knowledge.
All of our actions are
directed towards success in the above areas. What is stress? Hans
Selye first coined this expression to explain the feelings that occur inside
our bodies when we are involved in one specific achievement, or many different
achievements at the same time.
These feelings originate
from the emotion of fear, but since this word seems to attach weakness to the
person that it is directed to, we prefer to use the more acceptable word ---
stress.
In reality, they are
actually synonyms. The level of stress that you feel will be in direct
proportion to the potential for failure that is occurring inside your
mind.
You can be involved in an
achievement with total relaxation but if you make a mistake, then the next time
you attempt to address the same achievement, your stress level will be higher
because your expectations for success have been lowered.
The actual level of stress
that you feel has many components. As well as the one listed above, the
value that you place on the achievement is another.
The level of success that
you have been able to produce in the past also plays a part in determining how
much stress you will feel. Stress is indeed a highly personal
reaction.
One person’s stress can be
another person’s source of confidence. If you are reacting
correctly to this stress, you will increase your knowledge about the
achievement in question and your chances for success in the future will be
increased, which in turn will reduce your stress.
In this regard, it is
better to be involved in small achievements and work your way up to larger
achievements as you gain knowledge and experience.
This is of course exactly
how our Creator allows us to live our lives. We start out with small
child-like achievements and progress to more mature adult achievements.
One of the accepted
theories about stress is that our brains were programmed to handle fears that
would occur when we were still cave men. This fight or flight response is
supposedly inadequate and injurious to our physical and mental well being in the modern
world. This is absolute nonsense and in my opinion, it represents a very
low opinion of our Creator.
Let us say that a cave man
was out hunting for food and he was confronted by a huge lion. The fear
for his safety prepares the hunter for fight or flight.
In those days, against a
lion and before the invention of guns, the choice was either flight or hide,
either one of which is avoidance behavior.
If the [male] lion had
recently killed some other prey and it was not the least bit hungry, it might
not be interested in the man at all. Especially if it had picked up the
scent of a receptive female lion in the area and it was rushing towards this “much
more” important achievement.
After the lion had ignored
the man and gone past him, the man’s heart would be pounding and he would be feeling the
same kind of stress that you and I feel today.
It is true that the extra
daily physical activity that our ancestors were forced to perform in their
search for food would help to use up the extra adrenalin that the above
stressful situation would pour into his bloodstream but would not be used up
immediately.
Certainly, modern man with
his more sedentary life style must make a point of getting more exercise to use
up any extra adrenalin that accumulates in his bloodstream and body during all
of the achievements that he must become involved in during his or her
day.
Obviously, those
achievements are different than those that our ancestors faced, but the
underlying necessity is the same. The need to provide food for himself
and his family and all of the other necessities of life.
Of course in our age that
also includes achievements that we either volunteer to embrace, or we force
ourselves to embrace, --- so that we can enhance our life experiences.
Indeed the modern world
forces us to embrace far more complex achievements and though a hungry tiger or
lion isn’t threatening our lives, those complex achievements are constantly
threatening us with the potential for economic or interpersonal failure.
The modern world requires
us to understand more completely than we did in the past, and more completely
than we do at this time, --- how fear affects our minds and determines our
behavior.
We are failing to increase
our knowledge in this area fast enough and as a result, too many people are
being incorrectly told that they have some kind of genetic flaw, or chemical
imbalance in their brain that is preventing them from being successful in
the modern
world.
It is my unshakeable belief
that our Creator has constructed the human brain so that it could deal with the
uncertainties and consequent fears that confronted us in the past, --- the
present, --- and I truly believe, for all those years that will occur as far
into the future as our imaginary powers can perceive.
When a child learns to
walk, he or she stumbles and falls hundreds of times. Fortunately,
their bones are not as brittle as those of older people and they can take
the abuse. The child just keeps trying again and again until finally they
are able to walk.
It’s a good thing that our
Creator didn’t allow our brains to develop to the point where we can become
aware of a sense of shame and embarrassment before we tried to learn to
walk. Otherwise, some of us might
have given up after 10 or 20 failures and never tried again.
That is how some humans
conduct their lives in more complicated achievements as they get older.
If a growing child uses avoidance behavior when he or she should be learning
new maturing achievements, the child is in effect, --- failing to experience
the maturing process.
Although shyness is
relatively normal for a child, when it becomes all invasive, it must be looked
upon as a warning signal to the adults who are involved in the child’s journey
towards maturity, that psychological help is needed.
If a child does not receive
the proper help along the way, when he or she enters the adolescent years, the
new demands inside the mind and body of such a child, which are propelling him
or her towards being a sexually active individual, will clash vehemently with a
lifetime which was previously devoted to excessive avoidance behavior in too
many different circumstances.
The fact that so called
“mental illness”, first starts to manifest itself disproportionately between
the ages of 15 and 25 is not a coincidence.
In reality, it is one of
the pillars upon which the theory of conglomerated and distorted fears, as a causative
factor for mental illness, rests so convincingly.
Albert Einstein said, ---
“Men of clarity and vision are few and far apart in anyone’s lifetime.
What is preserved of their work is mankind’s most important property.”
In this regard, I would like
to thank all of the brilliant authors who poured out their knowledge and
experience into the books that they wrote concerning the discipline of
psychology and other fields also.
It was my good fortune to
be able to come into contact with such giants because of the extensive and
comprehensive library system that has been developed, not only here in my
native Canada,
but in the United States of
America and around the entire world
also.
Please accept my heartfelt
thanks to all those who are responsible in large and small ways for such a
wonderful and impressive library system.
To those of you who are so
inclined, I would highly recommend that you read the book called, “The
Resilience Factor”, written by Karen Reivich, Ph. D, and by Andrew Shatte, Ph. D.
It includes a seemingly endless series of successes for the Cognitive
Behavioral Therapy approach.
On page 48, you will see
the following words: --- “Feel free to skip this chapter if you
like, and move on to Part 2 of the book.” --- DON’T YOU DARE DO IT!
That chapter (3), in my
opinion, contains the most important information in the entire book. I
consider this chapter, which the author’s have entitled: “Laying The
Groundwork”, to be one of the most definitive statements concerning the past,
present and future of the science of psychology, that I have ever had the
pleasure of reading.
It contains the undeniable
blueprint that I predict will eventually propel us into a safer and more
dynamic future for the entire human race.
On page 54 of that book,
the following words appear: “An enormous body of evidence demonstrates
that cognitive behavioral therapy is a highly effective treatment for
anxiety and depression. People can bring about real
change in their lives --- if they focus on what really matters: ones
beliefs, thoughts and emotions.” I enthusiastically salute
both of its authors, Karen Revitch, Ph. D., and Andrew Shatte, Ph. D.
ADRENALINE
When your
work speaks for itself, don’t interrupt.
(Henry J.
Kaiser)
Adrenaline prepares the
body for action and it also prepares the mind for total concentration and
alertness. During the Korean War, autopsies were performed on many of the
casualties of front-line action.
Although these men were in
their early 20’s, the Doctor’s were amazed to discover that many of them
were suffering from a huge amount of plaque in their arteries.
Hans Selye demonstrated
many years ago that unrelenting stress, fear of injury or death, in laboratory
animals can cause physical damage inside the body and the brain of the affected
animals.
The Doctors said it looked
the same as if these dead soldiers were 70-year-old heart patients. They
also noted that it appeared entirely possible that the young soldiers could
have died of this problem before the bullets actually killed them. These
soldiers had to live with the fear of imminent death almost 24 hours of every
day.
I believe that the
adrenaline rush that is activated because of this fear, caused the excess
plaque, which I postulate would be un-metabolized adrenaline still in their
bloodstreams.
Since bullets do not
discriminate, we can also postulate that other “luckier” soldiers who were
wounded instead of killed, also had excess plaque in their bloodstreams.
If they were removed from
the killing zone because of their wounds, their bodies would have a chance to
break down or use up the excess adrenaline.
The appearance of their
arteries would, with the passage of time, and in accordance with the subjective
nature of each individual’s reactions to fear, have the potential to return to
a level which would be considered normal for their age group.
We can now use cat scans to
prove that such remedial action does take place. With this
knowledge, it is easier to see why some soldiers would use alcohol or
recreational drugs or even neuroleptic drugs to try to anesthetize or shut down
these unending fears that affected their internal body functions.
Since an inordinate number
of surviving soldiers in their early 20’s did not die of natural causes, as the
Doctors had predicted, then other factors must have entered into the equation
to keep them alive. I believe that these other factors, and the factors
thus described in the above story, prove that the
condition was at all times, --- negotiable.
I postulate that it was not
caused by genetic factors that could not be negotiated or dietary factors
either at that age. At the time, and in that book, nothing was said, or
perhaps even known about the physical affects on the brain of these soldiers.
However, now we know that
the brain actually swells up when it is under constant, unrelenting stress that
a soldier who must face the possibility of death on the front lines must endure
in all out war.
The CBC up here in Canada made a
TV movie, which they called, “Glory Enough For All.” It concerns the
discovery of Insulin by Frederick Banting, right here in the city of Toronto. Dr.
Bertrand Collup was brought in from the western province of Alberta
to help purify the extract.
He was actually the first
person to perform this task. However, in his excitement over his
discovery, he failed to keep adequate notes and could not replicate his
discovery. The search for purified
Insulin had to be continued for another period of time before Insulin was
finally purified once again.
I believe that the above
story about autopsies in the Korean War holds a very important example to prove
that my theories about distorted and conglomerated fears are correct.
I feel a kinship with Dr.
Collup because, although I have the quotations from the book, I failed to keep
adequate notes so that I could refer the reader to the actual source of this
story.
I believe that the book in
question was written between 1955 and 1965. The topic that the book
addressed itself to was Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder. The Korean story was not central to the book itself but
was merely one of many different topics described therein.
I have made a considerable
effort to find this book without success. If any of you who are reading
these words can help in locating --- “The Korean story” book,; I would
certainly appreciate hearing from you. My email address is --- strarrow2@gmail.com
Listen to the words of
Jerome L. Jacobs M.D., who wrote the book which he called, “Interplay.”
On page 96 and 97 ---
“Thousands of
Psychiatric casualties from the First World War were believed to have been
shell-shocked, brain damaged, by concussive explosions when in reality, they
were actually victims of fear.”
“It is simpler to
comprehend that a metabolic malfunction in the brain may produce neuroses, psychoses and even
criminality, and treat that disorder relatively cheaply with chemicals, than it
is to spend considerable amounts of time with patients in psychotherapy trying
to understand and sort out numerous variables in their developmental
experiences which are actually responsible for their suffering.”
Since this knowledge about
fear has been available for such a long period of time, why hasn’t the truth
become totally accepted? The answer is, unfortunately, that the success
rate for psychotherapy has not been good enough to bulldoze the bio-psychiatric
model into a mass grave where it so rightly belongs.
It is interesting to note
here, that the drugs that are now used for mental illness were originally
brought into existence to help calm the nerves of hospitalized patients who
were waiting for major surgery. These people were experiencing fears for their physical
well being and in some cases, the fear of death itself.
If the drug temporarily
damaged or dulled the brain, making it difficult to concentrate on ones fears
and as a result, calmed down the patient waiting for surgery, isn’t it rather
obvious that if it also helped the mentally ill person, that such people were
also being negatively influenced by conglomerated fears?
Not necessarily fear for
their physical well-being but fears associated with whatever achievements that
they were involved in and which they felt they were failing at.
Fears that in effect were
robbing them of the maturing process at whatever age they were at. And
still further, fears that were negatively affecting achievements that were
important to them. And if you will allow me to inflict upon you the curse
of repetition, --- fears that are at all time negotiable.
HELEN’S
HIVES
An
investment in knowledge pays the best dividend.
Helen Irving had a loving
and compassionate childhood environment but her parents did not verbally
express their love to their children. In her late 30’s, Helen had four
children of her own and since she and her husband had split up, Helen was
left to support her young family herself.
A colleague at work who had
just came back from holidays, mentioned to Helen that her extended family held
a family picnic get together each summer. Since Helen had moved some 100
miles away from her childhood home, she decided to set up the same kind
of picnic for her family also.
The next year came and once
again her colleague talked about a family reunion and Helen realized that she
had not followed through with her
plans. She made a promise to herself to make it happen the next
year and this time, she followed through with the plans.
Two months before the
family picnic was to occur, Helen’s mother died. Helen blamed
herself for her procrastination. It was her fault that they never had the
family reunion in time for her Mother to attend. For more than a year
after her death, Helen found herself pretending that her Mother was still
alive, as if to assuage her guilty feelings.
Helen broke out into hives
and visited her family Doctor. After 1 or 2 months of trying to find a
physical cause for the hives, her Doctor said, on her next visit, that she
wasn’t leaving his office until they found out what was bothering her. He
said that it didn’t necessarily have to be something that happened recently, it
could be something from the past also.
Again they went through all
of the possibilities for allergies and other physical causes, all to no
avail. Helen said that she could not think of anything that was bothering
her unless it had something to do with the fact that a year and a half ago her
Mother --- she never got to finish the sentence.
She broke down and cried
for about 10 minutes. She apologized profusely for her behavior,
telling the Doctor how she was sorry to waste his time while a room full of
patients waited for his help.
Fortunately for Helen, she
had one of the finest Doctors a person could ever hope to have. Never
mind that he was not a psychiatrist, he had just performed a psychic miracle.
He told her not to worry
about his other patients; she was more important than any one else at that
moment. He also told her to go ahead and cry until she released all of
the built-up inner tension.
Within two weeks the hives had disappeared.
Helen’s physical problem
was psychic in nature. How could a pill, prescribed by a psychiatrist, or
anyone else, --- solve this problem? Only by using the “talking therapy”
could this problem be solved directly.
What if a Doctor had given
her a pill for her nerves and seen her for 10 minutes once every 3
months? The odds of him helping to unearth the real cause of the hives
would, in all probability approach almost zero.
STUTTERING
SOLVED
A problem that is well
stated is half solved.
In reference to the
inconclusive success rate for Psychotherapy on this subject, it is only
necessary to review what some psychiatrists had to say about stuttering. ---
“Stuttering is caused by
the fear of the ego being overwhelmed by the all-powerful auto-eroticism. ---
It is a form of gratification of the original oral libido, which
continues as a postnatal gratification in talking.”
“Stuttering is a
pre-genital conversion (hysterical) neurosis in that the early problems
dealing with the retention and expulsion of the feces have been displaced
upwards into the sphincters of the mouth.”
And another gem reads like
this: --- “Stuttering represents the act of nursing at an illusory
nipple.”
The above quotes appear in
Dr. Martin F. Schwartz’s book entitled, “Stuttering Solved.” He helps his
patients overcome relevant fears and they were cured. None of the above
nonsense has any value in the situation whatsoever.
Freud himself tried to
treat stuttering and his misguided theories about how the human mind functions
can be seen interwoven into the above nonsensical quotes.
With this approach to other
more serious fears and distorted behavior, including mental illness, it is a
wonder that anybody was helped by such nonsense, which enjoyed an aura of authenticity
that became attached to the words, --- psychoanalysis and psychotherapy.
Dr. Sigmund Freud’s case
history of little Hans, which is reported on pages 31 and 32, of the book
called, --- Fear [Learning to Cope], shows that although Sigmund correctly
diagnosed that the boy was suffering from
fear, what really happened to him psychologically and what Sigmund thought was
happening, was entirely different.
No wonder that the success
rate for psychoanalysis was minimal. No wonder that other avenues for
dealing with mental illness, such as biological damage or genetic damage,
gained prominence over such ill-conceived, convoluted and confusing theories.
In the introduction to her
book entitled, “Psychotherapy: The Hazardous Cure”, Dorothy Tennov, who is a
consulting psychologist, discusses the hazards an unsuspecting patient may fall
prey to. ---
“Psychotherapists intent
on “hooking” a patient on long term and expensive therapy; --- advice
thoughtlessly given, ---careless misunderstanding and distortion of the
patients true needs and wants. An insidious domination by the therapist until
psychotherapy becomes the single ruling factor in the patient’s life.”
In Patricia Neal’s
autobiographical book entitled, “As I Am”, on page 132, appears the following
words: --- “I [Patricia Neal], knew from the first session, that I was
not going to like the Psychiatrist.”
“He had an insinuating
smile that said there’s something that you’re not telling me. But I
was so convinced that I needed to talk to someone that I went back”.
“It would not have taken a
genius to figure out why I was a wreck. I loved Gary (Cooper) but
he would not make a commitment. No amount of probing my psyche was
going to help."
"I told the Doctor that I wanted a family of my own. I wanted a house of my
own. I wanted a husband of my own; and furthermore; I wanted
to stop the sessions.” He smiled that smile
and said, --- 'But you haven’t mentioned masturbation.' I jumped
to my feet and ran for the door.”
Just exactly whose fear was
the psychiatrist addressing when he made the above statement about
masturbation? Using Patricia’s expression, it doesn’t take a genius to
see that he was addressing his own fear.
Not about masturbation, but
about losing a wealthy, well-known actress as a client whom he had hoped to
“hook” into a long-term analysis.
It was also entirely
possible that he was looking forward to bragging about the high profile actress
that he was able to attract. In all probability he was looking
forward to other important clients that he could attract and in the process,
make more money for himself and his family.
He was probably unprepared
and maybe even shocked by Patricia’s decisive action. He wanted to make
her think that he had some special insights to offer, to convince her not to
reject him. He was trying to impress her by his out of the blue comment
about masturbation.
What we have here is a
psychiatrist whose first priority was his own financial success. If you
really know what you are doing, and this applies to anyone in any profession,
you don’t have to “hook” another person.
Your success in helping
such a person, that you come into contact with because of your work, will
generate the necessary income you need to live comfortably.
Even though most of the
psychiatric profession has a much better profile than the one encapsulated
above, since, for the most part, it does not see reactions to fear at the core
of the mental health problem; its success rate, as it is presently constituted, will
never propel it to the place of eminence that it so rightly deserves and which
it should have attained many years ago.
So much for the negative
side of this problem. Now let’s take a look at trying to “solve” the
problem. Stuttering goes to the very heart of who we are as human
beings.
In her book called, --- Out
With It, --- Katherine Preston agrees with one of the individuals that she has
quoted who said that as a person who stutters:
“You don’t feel like you
are part of the human race.” “You seem to
have more of a kinship with lower animals whose ability to communicate is much
less refined than is our own.”
Our ability to communicate
with each other as extensively as we can is one of the most important differences
between us and all other forms of life on this planet.
The structure of our tongue
and more importantly, our voice box, had to be such that we could make a
multitude of different sounds so that eventually we could put together a
language such as the one that I am using right now to write these words.
Before the written word
could happen, the spoken word had to come first. It is the above
thoughts that make the quest to understand stuttering so complex and seemingly
beyond our ability to fully comprehend.
That conundrum is about to
be dispersed with. Some traumatic event precedes almost all forms of
stuttering. It is the building of the hierarchal approach to overcoming
fear that is required. It is the accumulation of the individual
steps for all fears that has eluded us thus far.
When Otis first
demonstrated the elevator at the Chicago Worlds Fair in 1893, no one would get
on his new-found contraption. Their fear was realistic.
If this new invention is so
wonderful then let Otis show us that we are safe in using it. Let
him get on the damn thing and if the cables snap, let us see what happens.
And so, that is exactly
what Otis had to do to convince people to ride on his elevator. He
got on the elevator himself and after being hoisted up to a certain height he
had an assistant cut the cables under the elevator car.
Apparently the original
brake was a rather strong spring at the bottom that cushioned Otis’ fall and he
emerged from the elevator car unharmed.
Once he put his life on the line, and remained alive, others were more
inclined to get onto his newfangled contraption.
So how do we construct a
series of hierarchical programs that will ultimately tame the multitude of
fears that constitutes what appears to be the confusing causes of
stuttering.
Usually just one fear
starts the stuttering process but then the existence of that stutter brings
many more new fears into existence inside the brain of the stuttering
person.
In her book called, --- Out
With It, --- Katherine Preston, through her determination and forbearance
constructed most of those hierarchies and has become almost cured of
stuttering.
As is the case with all of
us she had to progress through the mind-field of adolescence. Because
she was a girl and a beautiful one at that, her journey for a stutterer was in
many ways easier for her than for a less beautiful girl or for a shy boy.
A very curious choice of
words at one point in her book, in my mind, explains the occurrence of the
remaining stuttering that still afflicts her. She wanted to be different and
she wanted to find the cure for stuttering.
Until she believes that
such a cure exists and can see for herself that it does; it is my belief that
the small amount of stuttering that still inflicts itself into her
speech, will remain as it is.
However, there is another
way to look at this. As Katherine says, many people actually do overcome
their stuttering without really knowing why.
It is the construction of
the hierarchical approach that these people have achieved through their own
resources that has allowed them to achieve fluency. There is a real
chance that Katherine has already reached this level and will remain stutter
free.
Therefore, until the ideas
that I am expressing, which go against the understanding of most of the
researchers in this field, --- are accepted for the simple truth that they
represent; Katherine may indeed remain fluent without really understanding
why. I think that I have answered that question with the ideas that I
have expressed throughout this book.
THE KING’S
SPEECH
When you are 78 years old,
you tend to believe that you have already seen the most entertaining and
rewarding movie that you will ever see and yet the King's Speech comes along
and suddenly it takes that title for itself.
Mainly because it verifies
all of the ideas that I have put forward concerning the imminent importance of
understanding the emotion of fear.
If there ever was any doubt
in my mind about the veracity of my ideas about fear, it was ended for all time
when I had the unparalleled pleasure of watching that movie.
The most important point to
be realized is that this approach to fear will not only work for people who stammer but for any achievement that any of us become involved in.
This includes what I am
trying to do right now, which is to put forward new knowledge about how the
human mind functions on a deeper level than is understood at this particular
time.
At one point in the movie
Lionel Logge, the un-credentialed speech therapist who treated King George the
6th. says: "He is terrified of his own shadow." In
other words, the King is overwhelmed with fear.
I believe that it all began
with a Nanny who wanted to make herself so important that she would never lose
her job with the royal family, which thankfully for George’s sake, she finally
did.
At family dinners the Nanny
would bring George to the table but she would secretly pinch him and make him
cry. Then she would be asked to take George away from the table to
"put up with him" by herself.
On these occasions she
would then refuse to feed George for a certain period of time to scare him half
to death. She must have also convinced him that if he tried to tell on
her, that nobody would believe him and that she would make things even worse
for him. At the age of 4, George was easily reduced to silence.
Whether the future King
finally told someone or if someone else inadvertently saw the Nanny pinch
George, was not disclosed in the movie, but in any event, the offensive
maneuver lasted for 3 years before the Nanny was let go. During that time
George became afraid of his own thoughts and the stammering began.
Compounding this problem
was the epilepsy that plagued his younger brother Johnny who died at the age of
13. The royals never talked about Johnny and kept him as a secret
from the public at large.
The fear that there was
some kind of genetic flaw in the family entered George’s mind and probably the
mind of his older brother David also. These thoughts also added to
George's dilemma of keeping certain things quiet.
Certainly others who had to
endure this secrecy also, did not start stuttering but that is part of the
subjective nature of fear where some people react differently than others to
the same kind of fear.
This then becomes a
challenge for those who will follow me in trying to determine why certain fears
are displayed in certain ways and by whom.
Then the various swear
words were added to George's tension. As part of the royal family it was
expected that one did not use vulgar language in private as well as social
settings.
At more than one point in
the movie, to try to cure George of this fear, Mr. Logge deliberately provoked
the King into using such profanity in order to reduce the fear that he would
blurt out such profanity at an inappropriate moment.
In another scene, Lionel
Logge also provoked the King into forcefully declaring that he had a
voice. This gave the King more confidence and became part, --- at that
time, of an unknown hierarchy which helped the King overcome his fears and
inevitably his stammer.
After giving his first
speech about the war, Logge informed the King that he was still stammering on
his w’s. The King replied in effect: “I wanted to reassure the
public at large, that it was me speaking, not someone else who didn’t
stammer.”
I am sure that Lionel Logge
did not know about the hierarchical approach to overcoming fear but he
instinctively knew that it was important for him to do something to
reduce that fear if he was ever to relax the King and give him a chance to
speak normally and/or fluently.
As an aside, it appears
that the King’s older brother David used a convenient ploy to avoid facing the
fears of being the King and as such the Titular leader of the free world.
Breaking down like a child
at his mother's shoulder when he knew that he must become the King is a tip-off
to the level of fear that dominated his mind.
The ploy involved marrying
Mrs. Wallace Simpson in order to give him an excuse to abdicate the throne and
thereby avoid having to face his totally secret fear.
This was done without him
admitting to anyone else and perhaps even to himself that the above motives
were in play when he decided to abdicate.
The tip-off that David
entertained such thoughts occurred in the car when he mentioned to his younger
brother George that their father was choosing to die at that particular moment
to add to the pressure that David would experience when trying to decide
whether to face the responsibilities of being the King or leave it all behind
by choosing to marry Mrs. Simpson and be forced to abdicate.
Didn't he sound wonderfully
human when he gave it all up for the love of a woman?? What better way to
disguise his real intention, which was to avoid facing the aforementioned
fear. Did he ever admit this to himself or did he maintain until his
death that his only motivation was the love he felt for Mrs Wallace Simpson?
Returning to King George
the 6th., the responsibilities involved in being a King, especially in the new
age of radio, movies and television, which meant that the King had to be able to speak fluently,
added another level of fear that helped solidify his stammering. Logge
had to overcome all of these fears and many more in order to allow the King to
speak fluently.
GENETICS
OR NOT??? --- THAT IS THE QUESTION???
Recently I asked a close
acquaintance if he knew anyone who stuttered. After a brief
hesitation he said that he himself stuttered when he was young. If
he had not admitted it, I would never have known; he spoke with total fluency.
So how do those who believe
that stuttering is genetic explain this situation? Invariably they
say that if it was truly genetic, then he would still be stuttering right now
but since he is not, --- it wasn’t genetic to begin with.
Then the question becomes,
--- what was it that caused his stuttering? After all, if you are
going to say that stuttering is genetic, shouldn’t you also know why it is
not? Their answer is that the cause of stuttering is unknown and this
example fits into this scenario.
Isn’t it more than likely
that the cause is distorted fear? If in the future, the person
achieves fluency, then they have, in their own way, overcome that fear, or the
multitude of fears that stuttering can cause to happen inside the mind of a
person who stutters.
In the case of the above
mentioned person who stuttered, bullying by others while he was young was
definitely a factor in developing the stutter.
I am not sure how he
developed the necessary hierarchal approach to fear that allowed him to
overcome them. At least in regard to those fears that caused the stuttering to
start in the first place.
However, I will take an
educated guess. He told me that he did not read except perhaps the
local newspapers now and then. I think this forced him to decide
that either he would become fluent or he would not have any other pertinent form of
communication to fall back on.
It also allowed him to
avoid getting into discussions where he was less than confident about his
response. Not reading gave him an “excuse” not to get too involved when
he was in the stuttering stage.
It is my unequivocal belief
that the above ideas are much closer to the truth than trying to invoke the
genetic principle to explain this stuttering problem, or for that matter,
stuttering in general. It is my hope that you will agree with me in
this matter, which I believe should be considered self-evident.
MIGRAINE
HEADACHES
Migraine headaches involve
a conglomeration of thoughts about a situation where the individual cannot come
up with a solution and cannot get those thoughts out of their mind.
For a perfect example of
this phenomena you can find it in the book called, --- Clouds of Glory on page
1126 of the large print edition of that book.
Ulysses S. Grant had a
massive migraine that immediately disappeared when he got a message from Robert
E. Lee saying that he agreed to meet at Appomattox Court House to discuss the
terms of surrender.
ULCERS
Anyone
who thinks that there aren’t two sides
to every
argument is probably in one.
(The
cockle Bur)
All searchers for new
levels of truth become aware that if they actually do find a new truth, it
becomes readily apparent to them that the scope of the unknown is even greater
than they understood it to be before.
In fact such a feeling or
conviction may simply be the human reaction when we come face to face with
infinity. It is my unshakeable belief that the ultimate level of
understanding that is possible for the human mind does indeed approach infinity.
A researcher has discovered
that a certain bacteria causes stomach ulcers and that the age-old belief that nervous
tension causes ulcers, is therefore proven to be false.
But I contend that a
more detailed look at this situation is required. One of our Creator’s special miracles is the
capacity of the human digestive system (and other life forms also), and in
particular the stomach, to tear apart food that we eat, including meat, while
at the same time protecting the “meat” which is part of our bodies.
This is accomplished by a
miraculous mucous lining in our stomachs. Any tear or damage to this
lining would allow the digestive juices to react with the physical entity,
which is our stomach. The condition, which has the potential for
this to happen, is called an ulcer.
I think it is reasonable to
conclude that psychological factors, stress of one kind or another, as well as
physical factors, including a bacteria, can both be
causative agents to bring about an ulcer.
To further compound the
situation, a combination of both psychological factors and physical factors can
be the causative agents in forming an ulcerous condition.
When researchers find
differences inside the brain for those who are considered to be mentally ill,
are they looking at genetic damage; or, are they looking at the side effects,
or the physical manifestations that occur as a result of the thoughts that such
a brain or mind is entertaining? Once again, we have the age-old dilemma,
which came first, the chicken or the egg?
If an individual’s thoughts
are embracing distorted fears, then the telltale physical signs inside the
human brain can be interpreted two different ways. The physical
differences are causing the aberrant
behavior, or they are the result of the behavior, --- both are possible.
Since I believe that 90% of
the time, mental illness is caused by distorted and conglomerated reactions to
fear, it behooves us to try to correct this problem on an individual basis by
behavioral adjustments.
I should be able to help
most of the people whose stories appear in this book, with the rudimentary
skills that I possess in this area of behavioral adjustment.
Other people, more qualified than
I, who have spent many years studying and actually trying to help people with
problems related to stress, --- and if they add my ideas about fear to their already
acquired understanding, --- should be able to help certain individuals whose
problems I would be unable to comprehend.
Still other more complex
behaviors, --- although eventually those suffering from them may be helped
through adjustments to their reactions to fear in the future, --- at this
particular time and definitely in my case, those kind of problems are far
beyond my ability to comprehend or help the individuals so afflicted.
But before any such action
is started, the Doctor must do everything possible to rule out a physical cause
for the existing problem. Even though the above criteria is met, it still does
not mean that a psychological cause will be the determining factor causing the
problem(s).
A perfect illustration of
this dilemma is contained in the story about Carl and Lee, a Korean American
couple who were having sexual problems in their new marriage.
They were part of a culture
that mystified sex and an extended number of therapy sessions were required to
finally zero in on the problem. The couple was unable to consummate
their marriage.
The complete story can be
found in the book called, “The Pornographer’s Grief”, however, the name of the
book has now been changed to --- “Sexual Secrets”, it was written by a
brilliant Psychotherapist named Dr. Joseph Glenmullen.
Much time in therapy was
spent overcoming cultural taboos and misguided personal diagnosis by both Carl
and Lee, (Carl was impotent --- Lee was frigid), before Dr. Glenmullen finally
came to realize that Lee was a virgin.
Their culture was such that
a person never went to a Doctor unless they were sick. Consequently, Lee
had never had a gynecological examination. Dr Glenmullen’s guess turned out to be
right. Lee’s hymen was still in tact.
After a minor surgical
operation to break the hymen, all of the physical and psychological “problems”
disappeared and as Dr. Glenmullen so exquisitely noted, --- “When Carl and Lee
arrived for their next therapy session, they were both beaming with joy and
happiness.”
Other forms of therapy, not
including the bio-psychiatric approach, must begin to help their patients much
more quickly than they presently do. On the one hand, the large cost of
procuring such help makes it a poor option for many potential customers who
need psychological help.
On the other hand, today’s
world sees the general public rushed for time and a pill that seems to solve
their problems faster and just as good as “talking”, looks like a good choice
to make.
Especially when the
profession is so positive about the genetic and chemical imbalance theory to
explain mental illness and stress related tensions.
Making better use of a
psychotherapist’s time is paramount to overcoming the incorrect use of extended
medication. One cannot expect a Doctor such as Joseph Glenmullen to greet
his new patients, such as Carl and Lee, by asking if the wife is a virgin and
if her hymen is intact.
But, questionnaires which
are tailored to the reasons why a person is visiting a therapist could help to
reduce the amount of “work up time” required before the therapist finally
discovers what the real problem is.
Now we can talk about the
concerns, or fears affecting the therapists. Some of them would say, I
already am having trouble making a decent living in respect to my chosen
profession, now you are telling me to make less money. ‘I’ll look like a loser and a fool to my other
colleagues who will be making much more money than I will.”
I could be facetious here
and say to them, don’t worry, if the tensions become too strong for you, we’ll
put you on a Selective Serotonin Uptake Inhibitor. That way you can feel
more in tune with your patients.
In reality, once the new understanding
which is being put forward in this book is accepted, those therapists who
already are functioning in a manner consistent with my theories, will find
themselves so busy that the fear of not making a more than adequate living will
be non-existent.
This scenario is in keeping
with my theory that reactions to fear represent a spectrum of behavioral
patterns, which encompass both ends of such a spectrum.
Mental illness, acceptable
behavior considered to be normal, and behavior and achievements bordering on
genius are simply different positions on the spectrum of human behavior that is
negotiable.
Sigmund Freud was known to
have fainted in the presence of eminent scientists in his field. Since we
are not told that he fainted in other situations also, we can rule out physical
causes alone for this problem.
From his autobiographies,
we know that he was acutely affected by critical reviews or alternative
theories about psychology.
The fainting in my estimation
shows the extent of the psychological tension from the fear of failure,
rejection and the fear of confrontation with other contemporary members of his
profession that conglomerated inside Freud’s mind. It is a compilation of
such concerns and fears that I believe led to the fainting spells.
Unfortunately, Sigmund
ultimately died from smoking a pipe and also a cigar. One
could say that this is a physical problem, but all activity originates in the
mind.
In his day, they were
not sufficiently aware of the adverse effects of smoking on the human body and
consequently, --- as is the case in far too many situations, we had to learn
the hard way.
It has always seemed
interesting to me to realize that if a bad idea receives acceptance, --- as the
population increases and more people accept the bad idea, it then becomes more
obvious that the idea leading to the behavior is wrong and it should be given
up. However, as per usual with human habits, in some cases it takes
society a long time to overcome them and accept change.
Recently, I read an article
comparing Babe Ruth to Barry Bonds. Both of them were either alleged to,
or proven to be doing things that were not considered to be
positive role models for the younger generation. After half-heartedly
defending his drinking and carousing; Babe Ruth tried to back off the reporter
in one instance by saying: ---
“The next thing you’ll do
is criticize me for being a spokesman for Chesterfield
cigarettes. What’s wrong with having a relaxing smoke?
They have already shown that it help’s to calm people’s nerves down.”
Here is a perfect example
of why it takes so long to change human behavior. Especially if it is a
socially accepted one being endorsed by a celebrity figure. Maybe “the
Babe” should have just stuck to hitting baseballs.
Charles Darwin endured a
veritable lifetime of stress at a level that left him with many psychosomatic
symptoms. However, while some would say that these symptoms are
imaginary, I believe that they are not.
Our Creator gave us the
potential to live approximately 100 years. When we experience somatic
pains it can be compared to a small level of torture such as a drop of water
falling on ones forehead. Eventually it feels like a 5 pound brick.
Our hearts don’t give out
under stress until such time as the accumulation of such stress and the
resulting “somatic” pain adds up to a full blown heart attack. In Charles
Darwin’s case, that resulted in many difficult physical symptoms and finally
after 72 years, his life came to an end.
One could then conclude
that the above factors and, in all probability, a host of others also, combined
together to shorten his potential life span by 28 years.
Darwin could not endure the
tension of public speaking and throughout most of his life he vomited, and
endured much gastric distress. His life was such that he
developed a distorted fear for his physical health and of death itself.
To be sure, such fears were
reasonable under the circumstances that existed in his time, but a negative
outlook on ones health, or for that matter on any achievement whatsoever, tends
to become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
This is not achieved in
some mysterious unexplainable way; on the contrary, it is the manifestation, or
the by-product of negative thinking in general.
What we have here are two
recognized giants in their lifetime whose tensions shortened their life spans
and intensified their stress levels in their everyday existence.
They did not progress into
mental illness but in today’s psychiatric environment, some kind of mind-altering
drug such as Prozac or Paxil might easily have been prescribed for them.
On page 232 of Darwin’s biography
written by Janet Browne, and called simply “Darwin”; we are treated to a virtual
symposium of psychological components that led to his unending physical
problems.
He suffered serious bouts
of retching that brought up bile and acidic digestive juices, but interestingly
enough, he rarely if ever actually vomited up food.
His fears for his health
and potential death led him into a distorted fear that he would not have enough
time to complete the work that was so important to him.
One could then say that
such a fear should have compelled him to finish the book quickly but in
reality, he ruminated over it for more than 30 years, compiling endless
examples to prove his theory of evolution.
This came about because of
his distorted fear of failure, which manifested itself in a demand for
perfection in the most minuet details.
On page 249, Darwin’s cousin Fox, came
as close as possible to correctly labeling his uncle’s health problems with the
following statement: “I suppose your destiny is to let your brain
destroy your body.” Of course knowing what a problem is and
correcting it is an entirely different matter.
In any event, not only do
we owe a great level of gratitude to Charles Darwin for substantially adding to
mankind’s storehouse of knowledge, but with the understanding that we now have,
we know that he put up an heroic battle to entertain all of his many new
discoveries in the face of such debilitating physical problems.
In everyone’s life there
are moments when two fears collide. I believed that such
occurrences forced a person to go
through one of those fears.
Unfortunately, when I tried
to help a young woman in this manner, I found out that the person could avoid
both fears and continue in the immature approach to life that they brought to
the potential maturing process.
When such people avoid this
high potential situation for new mature approaches to life, the resulting
failures that such avoidance behavior causes, are then looked upon as a further
sign that their brain or nervous system is not good enough to function in the
modern complex world. In effect, instead of experiencing the potential
for something positive, they add to the thoughts that fuel their own negative
self-image.
On page 14 of the
above-mentioned book, we have Charles Darwin opening a letter from Alfred
Russel Wallace. In it he found a blow by blow description of natural
selection almost identical to his own. The fear of being upstaged
by Wallace; of seeing his 30 years of compiling the book all add up to nothing.
I believe that he also
correctly realized that Wallace’s depiction of the forces behind evolution were
not as compelling as his own. He correctly foresaw the high level
of skepticism and anger that would occur when his evolutionary theories were
put forward.
He probably concluded that
his own potential book was far more capable of withstanding the tumultuous
criticism that would be directed at his theory of evolution. If so, the future would
prove him to be totally accurate. All these thoughts and probably many
others combined together and as a result,
Charles Darwin was
experiencing the --- two fears colliding theory. He went through the fear
concerning the achievement that was the most important to him. He wrote
at a greater rate than at any time before in his life.
He finally ended his
procrastination, which can be a fear of failure brought on by a distorted
desire for perfection, --- and he completed the book.
Later he found out that
each edition, and there were many, allowed him to refine his theories based on
the constructive criticism of others because they had read the book. His
desire for absolute perfection was not warranted and it almost became
destructive.
To capsulate, Darwin experienced
massive anxiety because of his fear of death, which would rob him of the time
required to complete his achievement to bring new knowledge about evolutionary
forces into existence. The above ideas and his perfectionist
personality constantly activated his adrenal glands for the fight or flight
response.
One has to keep in mind
here that not only does the fear response prepare the individual for physical
action; it also provides nor-adrenaline to bring the human mind to full
alertness to meet the threat. This is the type of mental threat that Darwin was
experiencing.
This fear reaction shuts
down the digestive tract so that all of ones resources can be marshaled to meet
the potential challenge, --- physical or mental. Hence, his myriad
and extensive digestive disorders.
To a lesser extent, these
symptoms affected most if not all of Darwin’s
contemporary scientists and learned men in the Victorian era. One could
say that since Darwin
was entertaining the largest achievement of all of them, that his symptoms
would necessarily be greater and more profound
then those of his contemporaries.
Offsetting these concerns
is the fact that Darwin
avoided confrontation with others as much as possible. His good friend
Huxley did most of the defense of evolutionary principles for him.
This avoidance behavior
helped to keep Darwin
alive longer than might have been the case if he had faced such confrontations
without gaining the necessary psychological knowledge that is necessary to do
so successfully.
Of course these types of
assessments are not absolute. Each person develops reactions to stress
differently and some people are more confident than others.
Hence we find a spectrum of
reactions to the same stimuli from any group of people. Looking at his health problems from our vantage point, we could
make the following comments:
(a.) The fight or
flight response to fear, although well known in the external world in Darwin’s time, was not, I
believe, well understood in the internal world of the human body and in
particular, inside the human mind.
(b) The release
of adrenaline and especially nor-adrenaline was not specifically
known.
(c) The fact
that the digestive tract would be shut down under the influence of fear was not
known definitively to the point where such symptoms as suffered by Charles
Darwin, could be diagnosed as having psychological origins rather than physical
ones.
As a result, as has been
the case since time immemorial, Charles Darwin did what the entire human race
does at one time or another; he experimented with trial and error.
If we could use a time
machine to bring Mr. Darwin back to life, in reference to his unending physical
afflictions that affected him all of his life, we could offer him less error
and much more help.
The purpose of this article
is to show how the behavioral spectrum applies to geniuses who have the
potential, because of limited psychological knowledge, of seeing their behavior
manifest itself in physical symptoms of poor health or even placing them in the
zone that their contemporaries would call mental illness.
Then of course there are
all manner of variations in this spectrum and shifts from one extreme to the
other. The main thing to remember of course is that it is at all times
--- negotiable.
In conclusion, to decide
that certain behaviors are consistent with the theories put forward by
bio-psychiatry and to consign many of those people to a lifetime of
drugs can no longer be tolerated.
Even worse, is to tell them
that they cannot handle the everyday stress of modern day life like others with
better genetic material are capable of doing.
To then assign such people
to a position as a virtual spectator in the incredible game of life, when in
reality, with the proper psychological help, they still retain all of the
potential to be active participants thereof, is to rob them of the essence of
life itself. Such a state of affairs is, --- in my not so humble opinion,
--- an unacceptable tragedy.
No comments:
Post a Comment